Clinic Transparency Score Hair transplant transparency score based on public records, provided for informational purposes only. A high score means the clinic openly shares crucial information—like its medical team, true pricing, and other vital operational details.
FolliclMD is positioned as a Montreal hair restoration clinic focused on FUE hair transplantation and non-surgical hair-loss treatments. Its English website lists hair transplant, PRP, laser therapy, medication, natural treatments and supplements, FUE FAQ, before-and-after images, and patient-experience content.
Provider visibility appears through Dr. Hani Sinno, listed as a board-certified plastic surgeon with MD, CM, MEng, FRCSC, and FACS credentials. His profile describes plastic surgery residency at McGill University, a yearlong Harvard fellowship, and an assistant professor role at McGill University until 2016. The hair transplant content highlights FUE, AI-assisted robotic alignment, image-guided follicular analysis, donor-area assessment, post-procedure instructions, and follow-up planning.
Are the lead doctors clearly named on the website?
Does the clinic explain exactly what the doctor does (e.g., incisions) vs. technicians?
Is the doctor's specific medical specialty visible?
ISHRS / ABHRS / IAHRS
Rating max 5 + Count max 5
Active YouTube channel link or embedded video gallery
Transparent procedure costs, starting prices, or per-graft pricing listed publicly.
Full verifiable clinic address provided.
Privacy policies, HIPAA/PIPEDA, etc.
Dedicated patient results portfolio.
Medical warnings about suitability and donor limits.
Post-operative care protocols clearly explained.
Address and brand consistency across platforms.
Longevity of the clinic or surgeon's experience.
Clear mention of financing options or payment plans.
Clear explanation of the consultation process and fees.
Is this information outdated or incorrect? Request a Correction
Click to expand our objective verification methodology
Our proprietary scoring framework grades each clinic across 17 verification checkpoints grouped into 5 Core Transparency Pillars. This system evaluates public footprint transparency and data consistency to help patients review available clinical disclosures. It does not measure surgical quality or guarantee clinical outcomes.
Evaluates surgical team credentials, specialties, hands-on doctor roles, and active board memberships in top-tier organizations.
Verifies consultation process transparency, legal accountability, data protection, and physical operational presence in Chicago.
Analyzes independent Google reviews and verified video-recorded patient journeys to measure real visual proof.
Verifies public pricing honesty and the transparency of available financing or payment plan options.
Assesses years of clinical experience, transparency of before-and-after results, suitability guidance, and post-op care guidelines.
Upload your photos, get an expert graft estimate, compare global costs, and preview your transformation — all in just 30 seconds.
Start My Free Analysis →